2004 Unpublished Court of Appeals Opinions Index |
|
|
Use Adobe's Conversion Tool to convert the following PDF files into text in the event that you are viewing this page with assistive technology that is not compatible.
Kannamore v. Com., 2002-CA-001416 -- Not Published;
Affirming -- PDF
Kennedy v. Com., 2002-CA-000332 -- Not Published;
Affirming -- PDF
Kidd v Com, 2003-CA-000439--
Affirming -- PDF
Kidd V Com, 2003-CA-000439--Not To Be Published;
Affirming -- PDF
King v. Com., 2002-CA-002412 Not Published;
Affirming -- PDF King v. Com, 2002-CA-000516-MR--Not To Be Published;
Affirming -- PDF
Kirby v. Com., 2003-CA-000406 -- Published;
Vacating and Remanding -- PDF
Kirk v. Com, 2001-CA-001843-MR-- Not Published;
Affirming -- PDF
Kopp v. Com, 2002-CA-001629-MR-- Not Published;
Vacating and Remanding -- PDF
Krause V Com, /2003-CA-002092- Not To Be Published;
Affirming -- PDF
As a result of an indictment by a Jefferson County
grand jury, on March 29, 1994, Kannamore pled guilty to murder,
first-degree wanton endangerment, and second-degree assault. He
was sentenced to life in prison.
Norman Kennedy appeals from a judgment of the
Trigg Circuit Court convicting him of assault in the first
degree but mentally ill and sentencing him to fourteen-years’
imprisonment. Kennedy argues that he was deprived of a fair
trial because of comments by the Commonwealth concerning his
silence after having been advised of his right to remain silent.
Nicholas Kidd (the appellant) has sought
discretionary review of an opinion of the Barren Circuit Court,
which reversed a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV)
entered by the Barren District Court.Kidd was arrested and charged with driving under the influence of marijuana (DUI), a violation of KRS1 189A.010(1)(c).
After a jury found him guilty of the charge, Kidd persuaded the
district court that the verdict was not supported by sufficient
Nicholas Kidd (the appellant) has sought
discretionary review of an opinion of the Barren Circuit Court,
which reversed a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV)
entered by the Barren District Court.
This is an appeal from a judgment in which
appellant was convicted of first-degree assault for stabbing the
victim in a dispute over the shooting of appellant’s dog.
Appellant argues that the prosecution improperly displayed the
knife used in the crime during closing argument and that the
victim was erroneously allowed to testify that he was attending
a relatives’ funeral prior to the incident.
Barry King appeals from the judgment of the
Calloway Circuit Court, finding him guilty of possession of a
controlled substance in the first degree (cocaine) and of being
a persistent felony offender in the second degree, for which his
sentence was enhanced to ten years' imprisonment.
Timothy Kirby appeals the denial by the circuit
court of his motion under Kentucky Revised Statutes
(KRS) 439.3402 to be considered a victim of domestic violence
and, therefore, exempt from the severe limitations on parole
eligibility contained within KRS 439.3401.
On September 8, 1978, Appellant was initially
indicted by the Boyd County Grand Jury and charged with murder.
That indictment was dismissed in 1979 due to Appellant’s
incompetence to stand trial. The present appeals,2001-CA-001843-
MR, to be heard with 2001-CA-002611-MR, are predicated
upon a reindictment for the same offense on April 14, 1997.
James Kopp appeals from a judgment and sentence
on a plea of guilty whereby he was sentenced to two years’
imprisonment after allegedly failing to abide by the conditions
of a deferred sentencing agreement. The Commonwealth moved to
impose sentence on Kopp due to his alleged commission of a new
alcohol related offense.
Fredrick Krause III appeals from an order of
the McCracken Circuit Court denying his motion to suppress
evidence seized from his residence without a search warrant. At
issue is whether an officer who uses a ruse can obtain valid
consent to search, thus negating the requirement of a search
warrant. We find that the search did not violate Krause’s
rights to be free from unreasonable search and seizure because
the officer’s deception as to the intent of the search did not coerce Krause or his roommate, Joe Yamada, into giving consent
to search.
Return
to the Main Table of Cases