2004 Unpublished Court of Appeals Opinions Index |
|
|
Use Adobe's Conversion Tool to convert the following PDF files into text in the event that you are viewing this page with assistive technology that is not compatible.
Yocum V Com, 2003-CA-000852-MR-- Not Published;
2003-CA-000855-MR Affirming-MR -- PDF
York v. Com., 2002-CA-000320 & 2002-CA-000331-- Not Published;
Affirming -- PDF
Young v. Com, 2003-CA-001264 -- Not Published;
Affirming -- PDF This is an appeal from a final judgment and
subsequent order of the Boyle Circuit Court. The appellant,
Joseph Yocum, who entered a conditional guilty plea, challenges
the circuit court’s decision to permit evidence of a prior
offense to be admitted at trial. Yocum also challenges the
jurisdiction of the court to enter an order vacating his initial
sentence of two years and imposing a sentence of five years.
For the reasons stated hereafter, we affirm.
These are appeals from the denials of Paul D.
York’s (York) motions to expunge the criminal records associated
with indictments in actions in the Bracken and Mason Circuit Courts. Concluding the trial court did not abuse its
discretion, we affirm.
Hildreth Young appeals the revocation of his
probation for the commission of a subsequent offense before he
was convicted of the subsequent offense. Probation revocations
depend on proof of violation of a condition of probation. It is
not necessary to prove the violation through a criminal
conviction. The two charges are separate, the proceedings are separate, and each has separate penalties. The two proceedings
are independent of one another, hence we affirm.
Return
to the Main Table of Cases