2004 Unpublished Court of Appeals Opinions Index |
|
|
Use Adobe's Conversion Tool to convert the following PDF files into text in the event that you are viewing this page with assistive technology that is not compatible.
Ingabrand v Com.,2005-CA-001678
-- Not Published, Affirming --
PDF
Ingram V Com.,2004-CA-002272
-- Not Published ; Affirming
-- PDF
Isable v Com.,2004-CA-002533
-- Not Published ; Affirming
-- PDF
Vincent Ingabrand appeals from orders of
the Henry Circuit Court that denied his motion to vacate
judgment pursuant to RCr1 11.42. Ingabrand claims that the
charges against him should have been dismissed under a program
of pretrial diversion. He argues that his counsel was
ineffective for allowing him to enter a plea of guilty in light
of his lost opportunity for the dismissal that he had negotiated
and anticipated.
David Ingram appeals pro se from an order of
the Boone Circuit Court denying his motion seeking RCr 11.42
relief. For the reasons stated hereafter, we affirm.
Roger Isable appeals, pro se, from an order of
the Warren Circuit Court denying his request for post-conviction
relief pursuant to Kentucky Criminal Rule (RCr) 11.42. Isable
argued in an evidentiary hearing that his defense counsel was
ineffective for failing to request that the charges against him
be dismissed for failure to prosecute and performing an
inadequate investigation before advising him to plead guilty.
The trial court’s order points out that Isable obtained an
-2-
exceptionally favorable plea agreement, and refused to find that
his counsel was ineffective. We agree and affirm the trial
court’s order.
Return
to the Main Table of Cases