2006 Unpublished Court of Appeals Opinions Index |
|
|
Use Adobe's Conversion Tool to convert the following PDF files into text in the event that you are viewing this page with assistive technology that is not compatible.
K.A.C. a minor child v Com, 2005-CA-002202
--Not Published ; Affirming
-- PDF
K.M. A Child Under Eighteen
v Com.,2005-CA-002203
--Not Published ; Affirming
-- PDF
Keisker V Com.,2005-CA-000995
-- Not Published ; Affirming
-- PDF
Kennedy v Com.,2005-CA-001449
-- Not Published ; Affirming in Part, Vacating in Part
-- PDF
Kenney V Com.,2004-CA-002238
-- Not Published ; Affirming
-- PDF
Kidlow v Com.,2005-CA-001262
--Not Published,Affirming --
PDF
Kimble v Com.,2005-CA-001611
-- Not Published, Affirming --
PDF
Kipp v Com., 2005-CA-001268
-- Not Published ; Affirming
-- PDF
Kirby v Com.,2005-CA-002135
-- Not Published, Affirming --
PDF
Kleinjan v Com., 2005-CA-001913
-- Not Published ; Affirming
-- PDF
Kupper v Com., 2005-CA-000852
-- Published ; Affirming
-- PDF
K.A.C, born April 26, 1991, appeals
from a Juvenile Status Disposition Order of the Boyle Family
Court adjudging her beyond control, in contempt of the terms and
conditions of a previously imposed Juvenile Status Offender Order, and committing her to the custody of the Cabinet for
Health and Family Services (Cabinet) until age 18. For the
reasons stated below, we affirm.
K.M., a minor, appeals from a Juvenile Status
Disposition of the Boyle Family Court adjudging her beyond
control, in contempt of the terms and conditions of a previously
imposed Juvenile Status Offender Order, and committing her to
the custody of the Cabinet for Health and Family Services
(Cabinet). For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
Out-of-state retiree Victor Keisker
appeals from an order of the Franklin Circuit Court upholding
the Kentucky Retirement Systems’ calculation of the amount of
monthly out-of-pocket health insurance premium reimbursement he
is entitled to under KRS2 61.702 and KAR3 1:290, and upholding the Retirement Systems’ request for recoupment of premium
reimbursement overpayments made by the agency to Keisker. For
the reasons stated below, we affirm.
Olajowan Kennedy appeals from his
conviction and sentence for first degree robbery and fourth
degree assault by a Logan Circuit Court jury in April 2005.
Kennedy also avers it was error for the trial court to admit his videotaped statements made during his interrogation. Finding
merit in Kennedy’s first assignment of error, we vacate in part
and affirm in part.
Appellant, Milton Orr Kenney, pro se, appeals
the denial of his motion to modify and correct his sentence
pursuant to CR 60.02. We affirm.
Gregory Kildow appeals from an order entered
by the Marshall Circuit Court denying his motion seeking RCr
11.42 and CR 60.02 relief. For the reasons stated hereafter, we
affirm.
On August 26, 2003, the Fayette County Grand
Jury indicted Appellant Timothy Terrell Kimble on one count of
first-degree rape. Keith Eardley, an attorney with the Fayette
County Public Defender’s Office, was appointed to represent
Kimble. A trial was held on February 19, 2004, and, after
deliberating for several hours, the jury notified the court that they were unable to reach a verdict. The court instructed the
jury pursuant to Kentucky Rule of Criminal Procedure (RCr) 9.57,
and ordered that deliberations resume.
Kenneth Frank Kipp (Kipp) appeals from a final
judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court following a jury verdict
of guilty on one count each of burglary in the second degree,
assault in the third degree, and resisting arrest. Kipp claims
the trial court erred in striking a juror for cause, failing to
instruct the jury on criminal mischief in the third degree, and
failing to instruct the jury in a manner consistent with the presumption of innocence and burden of proof. For the reasons
stated below, we affirm the judgment on appeal.
Earl Brent Kirby appeals pro se from the
Madison Circuit Court’s order denying his motion seeking RCr
11.42 relief. Kirby raises multiple allegations of having been
afforded ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. For the
following reasons, we affirm.
Dale Kleinjan brings this appeal from an
order of the Spencer Circuit Court affirming a final order of
the Spencer County Board of Education (“Board”), appellees,
demoting him from his position as principal of Spencer County
Elementary School to a teaching position. For the reasons
stated below, we affirm.
Virginia Kupper has appealed from a judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court entered on March 29, 2005, following a jury trial convicting her of 14 counts of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree,2 14 counts of possession of stolen mail matter,3 four counts of fraudulent use of a credit card,4 and four counts of receipt of a stolen credit card.5 Having concluded that the trial court did not err in denying Kupper’s motion to suppress evidence, we affirm.
Return
to the Main Table of Cases