2006 Unpublished Court of Appeals Opinions Index |
|
|
Use Adobe's Conversion Tool to convert the following PDF files into text in the event that you are viewing this page with assistive technology that is not compatible.
N.T.G. A Minor v Com., 2005-CA-000035
-- To Be Published ;Reversing and Remanding
-- PDF
Nail v Com.,2005-CA-000848
-- Not Published, Affirming --
PDF
Nair v Com.,2005-CA-002019
-- Not Published ; Affirming
-- PDF
Nevitt v Com.,2004-CA-001784
--Not Published ; Affirming
-- PDF
Nichols v Com.,2005-CA-000630
-- Not Published, Affirming --
PDF
Nolan v Com.,2005-CA-001040
--Not Published,Affirming --
PDF
Nourse v Com.,2005-CA-002080
--Not Published ; Affirming
-- PDF
This case involves an order of the Juvenile
Division of the Hart District Court imposing fifteen days in
detention on N.T.G., a thirteen-year-old child. Although the
days in detention were probated, N.T.G. appealed the order to
the Hart Circuit Court contending KRS 635.060 prohibits
imposition of confinement in detention if the child is under
fourteen years of age. The Hart Circuit Court affirmed the
dispositional order based upon the fifteen days being probated,
relying on X.B. v. Commonwealth.2 We reverse and remand.
Appellant Christopher Nail appeals his
conviction for second-degree criminal abuse stemming from severe
injuries suffered by his seven and one-half week old son. He
argues in this appeal that the trial judge erred in amending the
indictment against him to include the phrase “by means of a
dangerous instrument” and in refusing to inform the jury that
his co-defendant’s case had been dismissed. We affirm.
Gary Nair was convicted of wanton murder in Jefferson Circuit Court. He received a sentence of life imprisonment. The Supreme Court of Kentucky affirmed his conviction on direct appeal on May 22, 1986. No. 85-SC-978-MR.
On August 9, 1991, this Court rendered an opinion affirming the denial of relief pursuant to RCr 11.42. No. 90-CA-1115-MR. Nair next filed a motion pursuant to CR 60.02(f) in Jefferson Circuit Court alleging defective jury instructions. That motion was denied and this appeal follows.
James Paul Nevitt was found guilty by a
Bullitt Circuit Court jury of six counts of sodomy and two
counts of sexual abuse. He was sentenced to serve three years’
imprisonment for each of the six counts of sodomy and ninety
days in the county jail for each of the counts of sexual abuse.
He appeals his conviction. Finding no error, we affirm.
Michael Nichols (Nichols) appeals from a
judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court granting summary
judgment in favor of Neil Huffman Nissan, Inc. (Huffman) on his
claims for breach of contract, fraud and conversion, excluding
the testimony of certain witnesses at the trial on his remaining claim of violating Kentucky’s Consumer Protection Act (CPA), and
granting a directed verdict in favor of Huffman on that claim at
trial. We affirm the decision of the trial court.
Donald Nolan appeals from an order of
the Greenup Circuit Court revoking his conditional discharge.
He alleges that he was denied due process because the
conditional discharge was revoked based on his inability to
complete a sex offender treatment program as required by the
order of conditional discharge and KRS 532.045.2 We agree with
the trial court that Nolan’s failure to complete the program is good and sufficient cause to revoke the period of conditional
discharge. We therefore affirm.
Othaniel Cantrell Nourse appeals from an order
of the Logan Circuit Court denying his motion filed pursuant to
CR 60.02(f). We conclude the circuit court ruled correctly and
hence, affirm.