2006 Unpublished Court of Appeals Opinions Index |
|
|
Use Adobe's Conversion Tool to convert the following PDF files into text in the event that you are viewing this page with assistive technology that is not compatible.
Yocum V Com.,2005-CA-001175
-- Not Published, Affirming --
PDF
York v Com.,2005-CA-000729
-- Not Published, Affirming --
PDF
Young v Com.,2005-CA-001030
-- Not Published, Affirming --
PDF
Joseph Gary Yocum appeals from a
judgment of the Washington Circuit Court wherein he was
convicted and sentenced for the crime of possession of cocaine.
We affirm.
Danny Wade York appeals from a final
judgment and sentence of imprisonment of the McCracken Circuit
Court. On January 6, 2005, a jury found York guilty of
complicity to possession of a methamphetamine precursor,
complicity to possession of anhydrous ammonia in an unapproved
container with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine, and giving a false name to a police officer. He was sentenced to
serve a total of ten (10) years at hard labor and was fined
$250.00. On appeal, York raises arguments relating to the
sufficiency and admissibility of the evidence presented at his
trial.
After peace officers confiscated methamphetamine
from the marital residence of Curtis and Laura Young, the two
were convicted of first-degree criminal possession of a
-2-
controlled substance (methamphetamine)1 and of possession of drug
paraphernalia.2 Laura was sentenced to four years in prison, but
Curtis’ sentence was enhanced to five years due to his prior
felony conviction. Their appeals were consolidated for our
review.
Return
to the Main Table of Cases